Log in
Language:

MERAL Myanmar Education Research and Learning Portal

  • MERAL
  • Universities
  • Ranking
AND
To


Index Link

Index Tree

WEKO

One fine body…

Item

{"_buckets": {"deposit": "97047d93-dfc5-4ae5-85c8-688a0499b03f"}, "_deposit": {"id": "397", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "recid", "value": "397"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:meral.edu.mm:recid/397"}, "control_number": "397", "item_1583103067471": {"attribute_name": "Title", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_1551255647225": "Judicial review over quasi-judicial functions", "subitem_1551255648112": "en"}]}, "item_1583103085720": {"attribute_name": "Description", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"interim": "The judicial review and control of the administrative action provide a fundamental safeguard against abuse of power and discretion. There are two main headings, grounds for review and methods of review. the grounds for review under three main factors; Jurisdictional matters, Error of law on the face of record and the rules of natural justice. The Supreme Court shall have power to issue directions in the nature of habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Quo warranto and Certirari appropriate to the rights granted.\r Introduction"}]}, "item_1583103108160": {"attribute_name": "Keywords", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"interim": "judicial review"}]}, "item_1583103120197": {"attribute_name": "Files", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_access", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2020-05-05"}], "displaytype": "preview", "download_preview_message": "", "filename": "Judicial Review over Quasi-Judicial .pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "187 Kb"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 187000, "url": {"url": "https://meral.edu.mm/record/397/files/Judicial Review over Quasi-Judicial .pdf"}, "version_id": ""}]}, "item_1583103131163": {"attribute_name": "Journal articles", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_issue": "1", "subitem_journal_title": "Universities Research Journal", "subitem_volume": "4"}]}, "item_1583103147082": {"attribute_name": "Conference papaers", "attribute_value_mlt": [{}]}, "item_1583103211336": {"attribute_name": "Books/reports/chapters", "attribute_value_mlt": [{}]}, "item_1583103233624": {"attribute_name": "Thesis/dissertations", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_supervisor(s)": []}]}, "item_1583105942107": {"attribute_name": "Authors", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_authors": [{"subitem_authors_fullname": "Zaw Min Htun"}]}]}, "item_1583108359239": {"attribute_name": "Upload Type", "attribute_name_i18n": "Upload Type", "attribute_value": "Publication"}, "item_1583108428133": {"attribute_name": "Publication type", "attribute_name_i18n": "Publication type", "attribute_value": "Journal article"}, "item_1583159729339": {"attribute_name": "Publication date", "attribute_name_i18n": "Publication date", "attribute_value": "2012"}, "item_1583159847033": {"attribute_name": "Identifier", "attribute_value": "https://oar.ydbu.edu.mm/handle/123456789/180"}, "item_title": "Judicial review over quasi-judicial functions", "item_type_id": "21", "owner": "1", "path": ["1582963788001/1582966312155"], "permalink_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12678/0000000397", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "Deposited date", "attribute_value": "2020-03-05"}, "publish_date": "2020-03-05", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "397", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["Judicial review over quasi-judicial functions"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
  1. Yadanabon University
  2. Department of Law

Judicial review over quasi-judicial functions

http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12678/0000000397
610b3e07-b9e9-4e14-9ecd-a6c06e3586b0
97047d93-dfc5-4ae5-85c8-688a0499b03f
Preview
Name / File License Actions
Judicial Judicial Review over Quasi-Judicial .pdf (187 Kb)
Publication type Journal article
Upload Type Publication
Title
Judicial review over quasi-judicial functions
en
Publication date 2012
Authors
Zaw Min Htun
Description
The judicial review and control of the administrative action provide a fundamental safeguard against abuse of power and discretion. There are two main headings, grounds for review and methods of review. the grounds for review under three main factors; Jurisdictional matters, Error of law on the face of record and the rules of natural justice. The Supreme Court shall have power to issue directions in the nature of habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Quo warranto and Certirari appropriate to the rights granted.
Introduction
Keywords
judicial review
Journal articles
1
Universities Research Journal
4
Conference papaers
Books/reports/chapters
Thesis/dissertations
Back
0
0
views
downloads
See details
Views Downloads

Versions

Ver.1 2020-03-08 07:59:17.297958
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley CiteULike Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Export

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
Other Formats
  • JSON

Confirm


Back to MERAL


Back to MERAL