{"_buckets": {"deposit": "97047d93-dfc5-4ae5-85c8-688a0499b03f"}, "_deposit": {"id": "397", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "recid", "value": "397"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:meral.edu.mm:recid/397"}, "control_number": "397", "item_1583103067471": {"attribute_name": "Title", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_1551255647225": "Judicial review over quasi-judicial functions", "subitem_1551255648112": "en"}]}, "item_1583103085720": {"attribute_name": "Description", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"interim": "The judicial review and control of the administrative action provide a fundamental safeguard against abuse of power and discretion. There are two main headings, grounds for review and methods of review. the grounds for review under three main factors; Jurisdictional matters, Error of law on the face of record and the rules of natural justice. The Supreme Court shall have power to issue directions in the nature of habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Quo warranto and Certirari appropriate to the rights granted.\r Introduction"}]}, "item_1583103108160": {"attribute_name": "Keywords", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"interim": "judicial review"}]}, "item_1583103120197": {"attribute_name": "Files", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_access", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2020-05-05"}], "displaytype": "preview", "filename": "Judicial Review over Quasi-Judicial .pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "187 Kb"}], "format": "application/pdf", "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf"}]}, "item_1583103131163": {"attribute_name": "Journal articles", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_issue": "1", "subitem_journal_title": "Universities Research Journal", "subitem_volume": "4"}]}, "item_1583103147082": {"attribute_name": "Conference papaers", "attribute_value_mlt": [{}]}, "item_1583103211336": {"attribute_name": "Books/reports/chapters", "attribute_value_mlt": [{}]}, "item_1583103233624": {"attribute_name": "Thesis/dissertations", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_supervisor(s)": []}]}, "item_1583105942107": {"attribute_name": "Authors", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_authors": [{"subitem_authors_fullname": "Zaw Min Htun"}]}]}, "item_1583108359239": {"attribute_name": "Upload Type", "attribute_name_i18n": "Upload Type", "attribute_value": "Publication"}, "item_1583108428133": {"attribute_name": "Publication type", "attribute_name_i18n": "Publication type", "attribute_value": "Journal article"}, "item_1583159729339": {"attribute_name": "Publication date", "attribute_name_i18n": "Publication date", "attribute_value": "2012"}, "item_1583159847033": {"attribute_name": "Identifier", "attribute_value": "https://oar.ydbu.edu.mm/handle/123456789/180"}, "item_title": "Judicial review over quasi-judicial functions", "item_type_id": "20", "owner": "1", "path": ["1582963788001/1582966312155"], "permalink_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12678/0000000397", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "Deposited date", "attribute_value": "2020-03-05"}, "publish_date": "2020-03-05", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "397", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["Judicial review over quasi-judicial functions"], "weko_shared_id": -1}