MERAL Myanmar Education Research and Learning Portal
Item
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "97047d93-dfc5-4ae5-85c8-688a0499b03f"}, "_deposit": {"id": "397", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "recid", "value": "397"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:meral.edu.mm:recid/397", "sets": ["user-ydbu"]}, "communities": ["ydbu"], "control_number": "397", "item_1583103067471": {"attribute_name": "Title", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_1551255647225": "Judicial review over quasi-judicial functions", "subitem_1551255648112": "en"}]}, "item_1583103085720": {"attribute_name": "Description", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"interim": "The judicial review and control of the administrative action provide a fundamental safeguard against abuse of power and discretion. There are two main headings, grounds for review and methods of review. the grounds for review under three main factors; Jurisdictional matters, Error of law on the face of record and the rules of natural justice. The Supreme Court shall have power to issue directions in the nature of habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Quo warranto and Certirari appropriate to the rights granted.\r Introduction"}]}, "item_1583103108160": {"attribute_name": "Keywords", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"interim": "judicial review"}]}, "item_1583103120197": {"attribute_name": "Files", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_access", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2020-05-05"}], "displaytype": "preview", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "Judicial Review over Quasi-Judicial .pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "187 Kb"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 187000.0, "url": {"url": "https://meral.edu.mm/record/397/files/Judicial Review over Quasi-Judicial .pdf"}, "version_id": "7fd40d52-4ef5-4581-afa1-357cb875c77a"}]}, "item_1583103131163": {"attribute_name": "Journal articles", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_issue": "1", "subitem_journal_title": "Universities Research Journal", "subitem_volume": "4"}]}, "item_1583103147082": {"attribute_name": "Conference papaers", "attribute_value_mlt": [{}]}, "item_1583103211336": {"attribute_name": "Books/reports/chapters", "attribute_value_mlt": [{}]}, "item_1583103233624": {"attribute_name": "Thesis/dissertations", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_supervisor(s)": []}]}, "item_1583105942107": {"attribute_name": "Authors", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_authors": [{"subitem_authors_fullname": "Zaw Min Htun"}]}]}, "item_1583108359239": {"attribute_name": "Upload type", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"interim": "Publication"}]}, "item_1583108428133": {"attribute_name": "Publication type", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"interim": "Journal article"}]}, "item_1583159729339": {"attribute_name": "Publication date", "attribute_value": "2012"}, "item_1583159847033": {"attribute_name": "Identifier", "attribute_value": "https://oar.ydbu.edu.mm/handle/123456789/180"}, "item_title": "Judicial review over quasi-judicial functions", "item_type_id": "21", "owner": "1", "path": ["1582966312155"], "permalink_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12678/0000000397", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "Deposited date", "attribute_value": "2020-03-05"}, "publish_date": "2020-03-05", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "397", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["Judicial review over quasi-judicial functions"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
Judicial review over quasi-judicial functions
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12678/0000000397
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12678/0000000397610b3e07-b9e9-4e14-9ecd-a6c06e3586b0
97047d93-dfc5-4ae5-85c8-688a0499b03f
Name / File | License | Actions |
---|---|---|
![]() |
|
Publication type | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal article | ||||||
Upload type | ||||||
Publication | ||||||
Title | ||||||
Title | Judicial review over quasi-judicial functions | |||||
Language | en | |||||
Publication date | 2012 | |||||
Authors | ||||||
Zaw Min Htun | ||||||
Description | ||||||
The judicial review and control of the administrative action provide a fundamental safeguard against abuse of power and discretion. There are two main headings, grounds for review and methods of review. the grounds for review under three main factors; Jurisdictional matters, Error of law on the face of record and the rules of natural justice. The Supreme Court shall have power to issue directions in the nature of habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Quo warranto and Certirari appropriate to the rights granted. Introduction |
||||||
Keywords | ||||||
judicial review | ||||||
Identifier | https://oar.ydbu.edu.mm/handle/123456789/180 | |||||
Journal articles | ||||||
1 | ||||||
Universities Research Journal | ||||||
4 | ||||||
Conference papaers | ||||||
Books/reports/chapters | ||||||
Thesis/dissertations |