Log in
Language:

MERAL Myanmar Education Research and Learning Portal

  • MERAL
  • Universities
  • Ranking
AND
To


Index Link

Index Tree

WEKO

One fine body…

Item

{"_buckets": {"deposit": "2d9a52df-747a-4c4f-a0af-3c131342486f"}, "_deposit": {"id": "235", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "recid", "value": "235"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:meral.edu.mm:recid/235"}, "control_number": "235", "item_1583103067471": {"attribute_name": "Title", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_1551255647225": "Assessment of rural livelihood in Kyaukpadaung Township as affected by PACT microfinance program", "subitem_1551255648112": "en"}]}, "item_1583103085720": {"attribute_name": "Description", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"interim": "This study was conducted to assess the livelihood of rural households as affected by PACT microfinance program in Kyaukpadaung Township. The data were collected through personal interview in sample six villages in October 2014. Sample households were differentiated into participant and non-participant households in PACT microfinance program. Comparison analysis and multiple regression model were used in the data analysis. In both types of households, while farming was the major source of occupation, non-farm jobs became the second source. Family size and income earning family members were higher in participant households. In addition, majority of the participant households were small holder farmers and landless. In the study area, most households were still suffered from poverty and food poverty, in the meantime, migration rate was rather high in both households. Analysis of income composition found that crop income dominated among the income of both households in the study area. Participant households utilized more credit sources and higher credit amount than non-participant households. While participant households suffered from more health and social shock, both households had applied borrowed money as coping strategy if they faced shocks. By means of the income function analysis, household income was found to be more increased by older household head, larger family size, higher non-farm income and farming households. Although household income was increased by participation in PACT microfinance program but did not show significant effects."}]}, "item_1583103108160": {"attribute_name": "Keywords", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"interim": "rural households"}]}, "item_1583103120197": {"attribute_name": "Files", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_access", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2020-05-05"}], "displaytype": "preview", "filename": "Aye Aye Tun.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "1475 Kb"}], "format": "application/pdf", "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf"}]}, "item_1583103131163": {"attribute_name": "Journal articles", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_journal_title": "Journal of Agricultural Research", "subitem_volume": "3"}]}, "item_1583103147082": {"attribute_name": "Conference papaers", "attribute_value_mlt": [{}]}, "item_1583103211336": {"attribute_name": "Books/reports/chapters", "attribute_value_mlt": [{}]}, "item_1583103233624": {"attribute_name": "Thesis/dissertations", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_supervisor(s)": []}]}, "item_1583105942107": {"attribute_name": "Authors", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_authors": [{"subitem_authors_fullname": "Aye Aye Htun"}, {"subitem_authors_fullname": "Hnin Yu Lwin"}, {"subitem_authors_fullname": "Thida Than"}, {"subitem_authors_fullname": "Tin May Yu Aung"}]}]}, "item_1583108359239": {"attribute_name": "Upload Type", "attribute_name_i18n": "Upload Type", "attribute_value": "Publication"}, "item_1583108428133": {"attribute_name": "Publication type", "attribute_name_i18n": "Publication type", "attribute_value": "Journal article"}, "item_1583159729339": {"attribute_name": "Publication date", "attribute_name_i18n": "Publication date", "attribute_value": "2016"}, "item_title": "Assessment of rural livelihood in Kyaukpadaung Township as affected by PACT microfinance program", "item_type_id": "21", "owner": "1", "path": ["1582963567848/1582969242608"], "permalink_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12678/0000000235", "publish_date": "2020-03-05", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "235", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["Assessment of rural livelihood in Kyaukpadaung Township as affected by PACT microfinance program"], "weko_creator_id": "1", "weko_shared_id": -1}
  1. Yezin Agricultural University
  2. Department of Agricultural Economics

Assessment of rural livelihood in Kyaukpadaung Township as affected by PACT microfinance program

Permalink : http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12678/0000000235
47c929e4-971c-4486-99e2-6aa9e6288a56
2d9a52df-747a-4c4f-a0af-3c131342486f
Preview
Name / File License Actions
Aye Aye Aye Tun.pdf (1.5 MB)
sha256: 76a50ba28bdde0db56cdc754edf8f2b6f482f1b82ca7f437a8eaa3d75ae6b842
Publication type Journal article
Upload Type Publication
Title
Assessment of rural livelihood in Kyaukpadaung Township as affected by PACT microfinance program
en
Publication date 2016
Authors
Aye Aye Htun
Hnin Yu Lwin
Thida Than
Tin May Yu Aung
Description
This study was conducted to assess the livelihood of rural households as affected by PACT microfinance program in Kyaukpadaung Township. The data were collected through personal interview in sample six villages in October 2014. Sample households were differentiated into participant and non-participant households in PACT microfinance program. Comparison analysis and multiple regression model were used in the data analysis. In both types of households, while farming was the major source of occupation, non-farm jobs became the second source. Family size and income earning family members were higher in participant households. In addition, majority of the participant households were small holder farmers and landless. In the study area, most households were still suffered from poverty and food poverty, in the meantime, migration rate was rather high in both households. Analysis of income composition found that crop income dominated among the income of both households in the study area. Participant households utilized more credit sources and higher credit amount than non-participant households. While participant households suffered from more health and social shock, both households had applied borrowed money as coping strategy if they faced shocks. By means of the income function analysis, household income was found to be more increased by older household head, larger family size, higher non-farm income and farming households. Although household income was increased by participation in PACT microfinance program but did not show significant effects.
Keywords
rural households
Files 1475 Kb
Available
2020-05-05
application/pdf
preview
application/pdf
open_access
Aye Aye Tun.pdf

Journal articles
Journal of Agricultural Research
3
Conference papaers
Books/reports/chapters
Thesis/dissertations
Back
0
0
views
downloads
See details
Views Downloads

Versions

Ver.1 2020-03-08 05:08:49.910368
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley CiteULike Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Export

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
Other Formats
  • JSON

Confirm


Back to MERAL


Back to MERAL