MERAL Myanmar Education Research and Learning Portal
Item
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "02049639-6e1f-413c-9afc-40b1f233ed54"}, "_deposit": {"created_by": 20, "id": "8754", "owner": "20", "owners": [20], "owners_ext": {"displayname": "", "username": ""}, "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "8754"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:meral.edu.mm:recid/00008754", "sets": ["1582963436320"]}, "author_link": [], "control_number": "8754", "item_1583103067471": {"attribute_name": "Title", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_1551255647225": "The Role of Agriculture Sector in Economic Development of Myanamar (1988/89-2002/2003) (Thida Htoo, 2007)", "subitem_1551255648112": "en"}]}, "item_1583103085720": {"attribute_name": "Description", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"interim": "The role of agriculture sector in economic development of Myanmar for the 1988/89-\n2002103 period was analyzed with the purpose of outlining the agricultural contributions\nto national economic development of Myanmar. It was found that agriculture has\ncontributed significantly to economic growth in terms of product, but the higher incomes\nresulting from increased production have neither fully benefited the cultivators nor\ncontributed to capital formation as a consequence of existence of leakages. In the past, as\npart of the process of agricultural development, there grew up a plural society in which a\npowerful minority of foreign races had established control over key sectors of the\neconomy such as trade, transport, industry and finance. The result was that the Myanmar\nthemselves just barely participated in the economic progress of the country. Increased\nimports of consumer goods then benefited the economically better off foreign element of\nthe population, concentrated in the urban sector of the country. At present, a few\nprivileged and propertied people replaced the foreign races of the past in controlling\nproduction and trade. Most imports are also neither relevant nor useful for the agricultural\npurpose but only to satisfy the urban consumers and the well to do. So the agriculture\nsector failed to play its proper role in its classical sense in that most of the surplus\nproduced domestically, instead of contributing to capital formation, has been drained\naway to foreign countries in exchange for cheap consumer and other personal use goods.\nOut of a wide range of crops exported, only export of pulses and beans are significant\nmainly due to liberalization of production and trade. Rice export has been severely\nrestricted so that it curtailed whatever contributions it could have made in terms of capital\nformation. The liberalization of rice trade was in reality characterized by inconsistencies\nand flaws that it was not able to implement effectively yet. Most institutions have not yet\nbecome the pro-market institutions for they have to stand and serve for the strengthening\nof the centrally controlled system, and the mechanism and administration of the\ngovernment. The UMFCCI is an obvious example. Despite \"liberalization\", the\ngovernment still plays a dominant role in the provision of farm inputs and other activities,\nbut fails to provide adequate farm inputs and necessary services and assistance, with theresult of slow growth of yields for most crops. Most export eamings have been drained\naway by leakages for import of irrelevant and ineffective items for capital formation. In\nthis sense, the agriculrure sector, despite providing considerable sum of export earnings,\nfailed to play its classical role in contributing to economic development.\nMost farmers and laborers migrated from agriculfure but mostly to foreign countries to\nwork for a living, rather than to domestic industrial sector mainly because no better\nemployment opportunities exist domestically. The out-migration of farmers was therefore\ncontnbuting to the development of other countries. For rnigration to contribute to the\ngrowth of Myanmar economy, the growth of SMEs was noted to be essential. So far, the\npotential factor contributions and market contributions of agriculture (in terms of export\nand domestic supply) have been highly constrained by inefficient policies and plans and\ninstifutions.\nThe present state of Myanmar agriculture is such that only the pulses and beans among\nthe crops were successful in production and export. The fishery sub-sector were relatively\nmore successful in production and export, and was able to contribute to the growth of its\nsector as well as national economic development in terms of increased earnings in foreign\nexchange and capital formation mainly because of 100% privatization of the sub-sector\nand proper play of market forces. Giving too high priority to increase rice cultivation\nalone with focus on maximization of output was identified as the cause for low real\nincomes despite significant increase in production. The import-substitution\nindustrialization which was largely financed by the export earnings mainly from\nagriculture and frsheries (and now gas) has drained away the hard-earned foreign\nexchange. The declining land-man ratio, fragmentation and degradation of land,\ninadequate supplies of inputs and loans or credits will need immediate attention to check\nthe sector\u0027s stagnation or possible deterioration. Genuine policy reforms to address these\nissues together with encouraging research and education and extension services will be\nrequired to increase the role of agriculture in economic development of Myanmar."}]}, "item_1583103120197": {"attribute_name": "Files", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_access", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2023-02-23"}], "displaytype": "preview", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "Thida Htoo, PhD-15.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "8.3 MB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_0", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 8300000.000000001, "url": {"url": "https://meral.edu.mm/record/8754/files/Thida Htoo, PhD-15.pdf"}, "version_id": "7fd9e7b6-ee4d-48ec-9153-77323a4e7701"}]}, "item_1583103233624": {"attribute_name": "Thesis/dissertations", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_awarding_university": "Yangon University of Economics", "subitem_supervisor(s)": [{"subitem_supervisor": "Professor Daw Tin Hla KYi"}]}]}, "item_1583105942107": {"attribute_name": "Authors", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_authors": [{"subitem_authors_fullname": "Thida Htoo"}]}]}, "item_1583108359239": {"attribute_name": "Upload type", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"interim": "Other"}]}, "item_1583108428133": {"attribute_name": "Publication type", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"interim": "Dissertation"}]}, "item_1583159729339": {"attribute_name": "Publication date", "attribute_value": "2007-01-01"}, "item_title": "The Role of Agriculture Sector in Economic Development of Myanamar (1988/89-2002/2003) (Thida Htoo, 2007)", "item_type_id": "21", "owner": "20", "path": ["1582963436320", "1582965742757"], "permalink_uri": "https://meral.edu.mm/records/8754", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "Deposit date", "attribute_value": "2023-02-23"}, "publish_date": "2023-02-23", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "8754", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["The Role of Agriculture Sector in Economic Development of Myanamar (1988/89-2002/2003) (Thida Htoo, 2007)"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
The Role of Agriculture Sector in Economic Development of Myanamar (1988/89-2002/2003) (Thida Htoo, 2007)
https://meral.edu.mm/records/8754
https://meral.edu.mm/records/8754a06f1ff2-4e26-4d80-bc96-709f32e0e900
02049639-6e1f-413c-9afc-40b1f233ed54
| Name / File | License | Actions |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| Publication type | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dissertation | ||||||
| Upload type | ||||||
| Other | ||||||
| Title | ||||||
| Title | The Role of Agriculture Sector in Economic Development of Myanamar (1988/89-2002/2003) (Thida Htoo, 2007) | |||||
| Language | en | |||||
| Publication date | 2007-01-01 | |||||
| Authors | ||||||
| Thida Htoo | ||||||
| Description | ||||||
| The role of agriculture sector in economic development of Myanmar for the 1988/89- 2002103 period was analyzed with the purpose of outlining the agricultural contributions to national economic development of Myanmar. It was found that agriculture has contributed significantly to economic growth in terms of product, but the higher incomes resulting from increased production have neither fully benefited the cultivators nor contributed to capital formation as a consequence of existence of leakages. In the past, as part of the process of agricultural development, there grew up a plural society in which a powerful minority of foreign races had established control over key sectors of the economy such as trade, transport, industry and finance. The result was that the Myanmar themselves just barely participated in the economic progress of the country. Increased imports of consumer goods then benefited the economically better off foreign element of the population, concentrated in the urban sector of the country. At present, a few privileged and propertied people replaced the foreign races of the past in controlling production and trade. Most imports are also neither relevant nor useful for the agricultural purpose but only to satisfy the urban consumers and the well to do. So the agriculture sector failed to play its proper role in its classical sense in that most of the surplus produced domestically, instead of contributing to capital formation, has been drained away to foreign countries in exchange for cheap consumer and other personal use goods. Out of a wide range of crops exported, only export of pulses and beans are significant mainly due to liberalization of production and trade. Rice export has been severely restricted so that it curtailed whatever contributions it could have made in terms of capital formation. The liberalization of rice trade was in reality characterized by inconsistencies and flaws that it was not able to implement effectively yet. Most institutions have not yet become the pro-market institutions for they have to stand and serve for the strengthening of the centrally controlled system, and the mechanism and administration of the government. The UMFCCI is an obvious example. Despite "liberalization", the government still plays a dominant role in the provision of farm inputs and other activities, but fails to provide adequate farm inputs and necessary services and assistance, with theresult of slow growth of yields for most crops. Most export eamings have been drained away by leakages for import of irrelevant and ineffective items for capital formation. In this sense, the agriculrure sector, despite providing considerable sum of export earnings, failed to play its classical role in contributing to economic development. Most farmers and laborers migrated from agriculfure but mostly to foreign countries to work for a living, rather than to domestic industrial sector mainly because no better employment opportunities exist domestically. The out-migration of farmers was therefore contnbuting to the development of other countries. For rnigration to contribute to the growth of Myanmar economy, the growth of SMEs was noted to be essential. So far, the potential factor contributions and market contributions of agriculture (in terms of export and domestic supply) have been highly constrained by inefficient policies and plans and instifutions. The present state of Myanmar agriculture is such that only the pulses and beans among the crops were successful in production and export. The fishery sub-sector were relatively more successful in production and export, and was able to contribute to the growth of its sector as well as national economic development in terms of increased earnings in foreign exchange and capital formation mainly because of 100% privatization of the sub-sector and proper play of market forces. Giving too high priority to increase rice cultivation alone with focus on maximization of output was identified as the cause for low real incomes despite significant increase in production. The import-substitution industrialization which was largely financed by the export earnings mainly from agriculture and frsheries (and now gas) has drained away the hard-earned foreign exchange. The declining land-man ratio, fragmentation and degradation of land, inadequate supplies of inputs and loans or credits will need immediate attention to check the sector's stagnation or possible deterioration. Genuine policy reforms to address these issues together with encouraging research and education and extension services will be required to increase the role of agriculture in economic development of Myanmar. |
||||||
| Thesis/dissertations | ||||||
| Yangon University of Economics | ||||||
| Professor Daw Tin Hla KYi | ||||||