{"created":"2020-03-08T04:59:42.246688+00:00","id":43,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"28b91634-7246-4250-80d8-d1a355b9aabc"},"_deposit":{"id":"43","owners":[],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"recid","value":"43"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:meral.edu.mm:recid/43","sets":["1582963567848:1582969027121"]},"communities":["yau"],"control_number":"43","item_1583103067471":{"attribute_name":"Title","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1551255647225":"EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT CROP MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON GROWTH, YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.)","subitem_1551255648112":"en"}]},"item_1583103085720":{"attribute_name":"Description","attribute_value_mlt":[{"interim":"To investigate the effect of different crop management practices on growth, yield and yield components of chickpea, field experiments were conducted from November 2018 to February 2019 at Tatkon and Zaloke research farms. Randomized Complete Block design (RCB) was replicated as four including the eight treatments, control (no weeding + no basal fertilizer + no foliar applications) as (T1), hand weeding at 30 Day After Sowing (DAS) as (T2), basal fertilizer application (14.46 kg N ha-1, 12.45 kg P ha-1 and 11.32 kg K ha-1) as (T3), foliar applications as (T4), hand weeding at 30 DAS + basal fertilizer application as (T5), hand weeding at 30 DAS + foliar applications as (T6), basal fertilizer + foliar applications as (T7) and hand weeding at 30 DAS + basal fertilizer + foliar applications as (T8).The tested chickpea variety was Yezin-6 for both experimental sites. For the foliar applications, Hyper Grow foliar (N:30, P2O5:10, K2O:10) and Calbomag Super (Ca:5.0, B:0.5, Mg:3.0,) was sprayed at 30, and 45 DAS, respectively. Plant growth performances such as plant height and the number of primary branches per plant had significantly different among the crop management practices in Tatkon research farm whereas these performances had not in Zaloke research farm. The leaf area index and total dry biomass were significantly different among the crop management practices in both experimental sites. The highest LAI was observed from T8 (1.14) and followed by T5 (1.10) while the lowest LAI (0.74) was in T1 in Tatkon. The higher seed yield was resulted in T8 (1,116.21 kg ha-1), however, this result was not greatly different from T5 (1,037.48 kg ha-1), T6 (1,014.45 kg ha-1) and T2 (1,008.90 kg ha-1). Among them, the lowest seed yield (kg ha-1) was recorded in T1 (767.14 kg ha-1). In Zaloke, the seed yield did not show significantly as affected by different crop management practices. The maximum seed yield was produced by T8 (982.38 kg ha-1) whereas the minimum seed yield was obtained from T1 (674.35 kg ha-1). The higher net monetary returns were obtained in T2 and T6 at Tatkon and Zaloke respectively."}]},"item_1583103108160":{"attribute_name":"Keywords"},"item_1583103120197":{"attribute_name":"Files","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_access","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2020-05-05"}],"displaytype":"preview","filename":"Hnin Hnin Lat(AGY-162) Thesis.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"3768 Kb"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"url":"https://meral.edu.mm/record/43/files/Hnin Hnin Lat(AGY-162) Thesis.pdf"},"version_id":"4b427a67-c062-44b2-aaad-4d39e98e32c1"}]},"item_1583103131163":{"attribute_name":"Journal articles","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_journal_title":"Yezin Agricultural University"}]},"item_1583103147082":{"attribute_name":"Conference papaers","attribute_value_mlt":[{}]},"item_1583103211336":{"attribute_name":"Books/reports/chapters","attribute_value_mlt":[{}]},"item_1583103233624":{"attribute_name":"Thesis/dissertations","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_supervisor(s)":[]}]},"item_1583105942107":{"attribute_name":"Authors","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_authors":[{"subitem_authors_fullname":"HNIN HNIN LAT"}]}]},"item_1583108359239":{"attribute_name":"Upload type","attribute_value_mlt":[{"interim":"Publication"}]},"item_1583108428133":{"attribute_name":"Publication type","attribute_value_mlt":[{"interim":"Thesis"}]},"item_1583159729339":{"attribute_name":"Publication date","attribute_value":"2019-09"},"item_1583159847033":{"attribute_name":"Identifier","attribute_value":"https://yauor-yau.archive.knowledgearc.net/handle/123456789/157"},"item_title":"EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT CROP MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON GROWTH, YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.)","item_type_id":"21","owner":"1","path":["1582969027121"],"publish_date":"2020-03-05","publish_status":"0","recid":"43","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT CROP MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON GROWTH, YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.)"],"weko_creator_id":"1","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2021-12-13T04:56:16.394653+00:00"}