<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-26T03:03:08Z</responseDate>
  <request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:meral.edu.mm:recid/5170" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://meral.edu.mm/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:meral.edu.mm:recid/5170</identifier>
        <datestamp>2021-12-13T03:44:49Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>1582963492007:1595850089647</setSpec>
        <setSpec>user-yuoe</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Construction of Parallel forms of Grade 10 Chemistry and  Finding its Reliability Coefficient of Equivalence</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Thae Phyu Htwe</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Tun Thein</dc:creator>
          <dc:description>The main purpose of this study was to develop two parallel forms of test for
Grade (10) Chemistry. This thesis was mainly concerned with planning,
constructing, and analysis of test items. And then, two parallel forms of test
were administered to 524 Grade (10) students from Ten Basic Education
High Schools in Yangon Region. Descriptive survey method and
quantitative research design were used in this study. From 80 items of both
forms, 12 pairs of items were selected as parallel items according to their
similar levels and ranges of difficulties and discriminations. Since reliability
coefficient of equivalence of Form A and Form B is 0.703, both forms have
strong positive relationship. So, students who performed well in Form A
would also perform well in Form B. Form A can be used to get more
information for measuring chemistry achievement of students who have
θ = -1.4. Form B had smaller standard error across the ability scale from -
2.5 to +1.5 and larger standard error had at the low and high ends of the
scale. The maximum amount of information was I(θ) = 6.7 at θ = +0.2.
Ability estimates were more precise across the ability scale from -2.5 to
+1.5 than at the high and low ends of the scale. Therefore, Form B could be
suitable to measure for students whose ability is θ = +0.2. The expected
ability distributions of the students (Form A and Form B were applied) were
normally distributed across the ability scale.</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2019</dc:date>
          <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12678/0000005170</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://meral.edu.mm/records/5170</dc:identifier>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
